Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
It is clear that both approaches are complementary.
Both approaches are complementary.
We believe both approaches are complementary.
In our opinion, both approaches are complementary.
Both approaches are complementary, and each has its own limitations.
Both approaches are complementary, and further investigation should be made to assess the utility of a combined approach.
Similar(48)
Yet, activity and participation are major outcomes for both approaches and it is plausible that the two approaches are complementary.
The results indicate that the two approaches are complementary.
In the case of creationism, the approaches are complementary.
The two approaches are complementary.
Therefore, the two approaches are complementary.
More suggestions(18)
both models are complementary
both approaches are popular
both factors are complementary
both approaches are useful
both strategies are complementary
both missions are complementary
both frameworks are complementary
both approaches are feasible
both platforms are complementary
both classifications are complementary
both approaches offer complementary
both approaches are great
both approaches are organic
both formats are complementary
both criteria are complementary
both instruments are complementary
both types are complementary
both approaches are untested
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com