Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(15)
Results of both approaches are compared.
The results of both approaches are compared and discussed.
Predictions obtained with both approaches are compared to experimental values.
The best results from both approaches are compared and discussed.
Both approaches are compared against 123 experimental data on expanded and underexpanded jet flames.
At the end both approaches are compared with the help of experiments on the actuator.
Similar(45)
Both approaches were compared in this study.
The simulation results for the catalytic wet oxidation process by both approaches were compared.
Then, in order to investigate the reliability of the ACK, static and dynamic simulations of both approaches were compared with each other and with analytical calculations on basic beam models.
Secondly, if pragmatic rehabilitation and supportive listening were equivalent, both approaches were compared with GP treatment as usual.
Both approaches were compared using the M 1) resulting from the analysis of the baseline model in the first stage.
More suggestions(17)
both approaches are evaluated
both methods are compared
both approaches are explored
both cases are compared
both models are compared
both materials are compared
both problems are compared
both approaches are detailed
both plants are compared
both paradigms are compared
both strategies are compared
both schemes are compared
both objectives are compared
both approaches are flawed
both approaches are mitigated
both scenarios are compared
both approaches are described
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com