Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
Both analyses indicated that leaf mortality risk increased monotonically with leaf age.
Both analyses indicated that soil order and land cover were the dominant contributors to tick presence.
Results from both analyses indicated that males and females, although differing in overall shape, followed the same shape change trajectories through both common and global morphospace (additional file 1).
In general, both analyses indicated that the majority of the identified proteins/transcripts were present in both cell types and did not demonstrate significant differences in abundance (P > 0.05).
Combined results of both analyses indicated that 12 tumours had LOH (10 hypermethylated CTCF6 and UPD 2 hypermethylated CTCF6 and hemizygous 11p15 deletion), 9 had LOI (hypermethylated CTCF6 and retention of heterozygosity (ROH)) and 22 had ROI (normally methylated CTCF6 and ROH).
Since the percentage of the pea database mapping remained below both other legume mappings (31%to35%and49% 49%, respectively), the approach based on BlastX supported the results of the tagging analysis: both analyses indicated that the transcriptome coverage was not complete.
Similar(54)
Moreover, the large number of maximal and maximum cliques with few members in both analyses indicates that there is no individual concentration of indications.
The results of both analyses indicate that ICOPPE/UFRJ is close to IG/PUC-Rio and perhaps PqTec-SJC is not so developed.
The results from both analyses indicate that reliability is affected by geographic scale (census tract vs dissemination area) when using place of residence as a proxy for place of injury.
Statistically, the results of both analyses indicate that larger choruses have a higher probability of successful reproduction.
Both analyses indicate that S. oneidensis MR-1, which has been subjected to a detail genomic and proteomic investigation, evolved after the species PV4 and WP3 during the Shewanella genus evolution.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com