Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
The southern border of the electrojet tended to move northward when the current weakened.
We attribute this to being near the southern border of the electrojet, where small inaccuracies in its exact location could lead to large changes in the modeled perturbations.
Similar(58)
The parameters within the models were adjusted manually until a good match was obtained to the data, and parameters in the meridian case chain included the latitudinal borders of the electrojet and its current, along with the depth to a hypothetical superconductor representing Earth conductivity, and the height of the ionosphere.
We thus attribute meaning to those parameters: there are often well-defined borders to the electrojet, and the current across a meridian is well inferred from AMM inversion.
The implications of this small numerical experiment are that there likely was an enhanced poleward border of the poleward expanding substorm westward electrojet.
It is clear (even from the low cadence data inverted) that substorm onset with the classic signatures of strengthening of the westward electrojet and poleward motion of the electrojet (here only the northern border) took place at 18 45 and was well underway at 18 50, the latter being the time found in other studies.
Limited analysis is done by segregating the results into temporal sessions of pre-attainment and post-attainment of the electrojet peak.
The poleward boundary of the electrojet also moved steadily equatorward.
In the northern half of the electrojet, Z is not large enough in the model, which may be due to structure in the electrojet not present in the model's uniform electrojet.
In a simple two-dimensional picture of electrojets, a Z increase would indicate motion of the electrojet to the south of the detecting station.
The majority of nodes (432) are influenced by the position of the electrojet in the simulations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com