Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Participants in the intervention group had significantly lower glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), plaque index score, gingival index score, pocket depth, clinical attachment level (CAL), and percentage of bleeding on probing (BOP) when compared to the control group.
Increased expression and interaction of C3a and C3a receptor (C3aR) were observed in both the cortex and hippocampus at 3 and 24 h after BOP when compared to respective controls.
Similar(58)
When compared to the An.
However, in the only randomised study to date of an induction regimen dose intense therapy, when compared to standard BEP in 380 patients, BOP/VIP-B showed greater toxicity but no improvement in response or OS (Kaye et al, 1998).
ERD patients showed a higher percentage of BOP as compared to NERD patients.
Furthermore, the 5-year projected survival rate was significantly longer for those who had responded to BOP, as compared to COP (74% vs 56%; P= 0.05).
BOP in the Perio group was significantly different compared to the BOP scores of the CHD group (p = 0.001) and the control group (p < 0.001).
Treatment with the COP regimen was associated with a higher incidence of grade III/IV leukopenia (34% vs 19%) and anemia (13% vs 10%) as compared to BOP, although, thrombocytopenia was slightly more common in the BOP arm.
Investigate the characteristics and differences of FOP compared to BOP.
The goals of the present study are to: Cephalometrically evaluate OP inclination changes in orthodontically treated patients Compare the OP inclination in three different dentoskeletal frames before and after treatment Investigate the characteristics and differences of FOP compared to BOP.
The treatment time of each cycle of adjuvant BOP was reduced to 48 h, compared to 3 days or more for BEP treatment, and the overall duration of treatment reduced from 5 weeks with BEP to 3 weeks.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com