Sentence examples for bootstrap support levels from inspiring English sources

For bootstrap support levels, we considered bootstrap percentages (BP) of 50 70% as weak, 71 85% as moderate and >85% as strong (Kores et al. 2001).

Bootstrap support levels at nodes were calculated after 500 replications.

The trimmed alignments tended to exaggerate sequence divergence and modestly lower bootstrap support levels.

Intriguingly, when fastest-evolving sites were further removed, the T1 topology became more robust and received maximal bootstrap support levels of 96%and90%0% in ML and MP analyses, respectively.

Using these newly estimated phylogenies, we calculate two simple metrics of phylogenetic resolution based on the fraction of the nodes that are resolved at the 50% and 95% bootstrap support levels for each of the 100 clades (see Methods section).

For the ML analyses apart from nt3, bootstrap support levels are generally high near the tips of the trees, typically within and among closely related families, whereas support at deeper levels - among superfamilies or more inclusive clades - is very weak, with almost no nodes reaching BP of even 50%.

Phylogenetic analyses involving the TUB paralogs were performed on an 18 taxa, 666 character dataset using parsimony, resulting in two most parsimonious trees of 399 steps each (CI  =  0.912; RI  =  0.934) that were topologically identical on a 70% bootstrap support level.

For example, of the 70 data sets from the single-locus simulation, 57 had > 90% of nodes supported at the ≥ 70 bootstrap support level.

In contrast, 28 of the 70 data sets from the full simulation had > 90% of nodes supported at the ≥ 70 bootstrap support level.

For the remaining experiments we used a bootstrap support level b computed using a significance level of 0.05 under the binomial null model detailed in the Methods section.

At the 70% bootstrap support level, most in silico transfers resulted in at least one conflict with one of the majority bipartitions.