Sentence examples for bootstrap support is weak from inspiring English sources
Instead, most LDH and MDH proteins appear to derive from separate linages, although bootstrap support is weak for deeply branching nodes in this tree.
The order of divergence of R. praetor and R. leucopus is somewhat uncertain; the time interval between the dates of divergence is small and ML bootstrap support is weak.
Although bootstrap support is weak at the base of the Dipteran-type JHE node in this tree, these genes share the diagnostic residues that suggest JHE identity (Mackert et al. 2008) and a clear lack of affinity to any other esterase gene present in the Arthropoda (represented in supplementary fig. S21, Supplementary Material online, by Dr. melanogaster sequences).
Phylogenies based on phytochrome [ 41] and 17 chloroplast [ 42] genes placed magnoliids sister to monocots + eudicots but bootstrap support was weak.
However, statistical support is weak (ML bootstrap values: 60 63%, Bayesian posterior probabilities: 0.63 0.97) and alternative positions of P. ursinus South within the baboon clade (sister to either the southern or northern clades, or an unresolved trichotomy among these two clades and P. ursinus South) are statistically not rejected (P > 0.05).
A few exceptions where the bootstrap and posterior probability support is weaker are also seen.
However, in many cases the bootstrap support was very weak.
Several studies supported the second hypothesis [ 7, 16, 68], however, bootstrap support was again weak ranging from 55 – 78%.
Several studies supported monocots as the sister group of magnoliids + eudicots [ 43- 45] but bootstrap support was again weak.
Trees were manually sorted into four categories: red algal or green algal (with >75% bootstrap support), ambiguous (if support was weak but was nonetheless consistent with a red or green origin), or "other" (if too few taxa were present or the phylogenetic groupings were unclear).
