Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(7)
We did 1000 bootstraps and the 95% bootstrap confidence interval for this particular example is (0.448, 0.549).
The estimation of the bootstrap confidence interval for the LS score using B bootstraps will need O(Bn) calculations.
It should be noted that the bootstrap confidence interval for "current heavy drinker" is very wide, compared to other variables.
The bias corrected bootstrap confidence interval for the coefficient of determination was 0.558 0.987.>.> -wrap-foot> Adjusted R2- and p-values for different models for prediction of follow-up creatinine are shown.
With replicates, it is possible to evaluate the variation of and to give a bootstrap confidence interval for the local similarity (LS) score as defined in Ruan et al.[ 11].
For each simulation dataset, calculate the bootstrap standard error and the 95% bootstrap confidence interval for the RVs. 4. Calculate the average bootstrap standard error, the average 95% bootstrap confidence interval, and the proportion of significant RVs (the "power ") across the 100 simulation datasets.
Similar(53)
Mason, S. J., and G. M. Mimmack, 1992: The use of bootstrap confidence intervals for the correlation coefficient in climatology.
The bootstrap confidence intervals for gene effect did not include zero for protein percent on chromosome 2 and fat yield, protein yield, and SCS on chromosome 7. Quantitative trait locus heterozygosity was 33%, which is consistent with the hypothesis that only two alleles are segregating with unequal allele frequency.
Fig. 6 95% bootstrap confidence intervals for global weights.
It also provides bootstrap confidence intervals for the CCC, as well as for the difference in CCCs for both independent and dependent samples.
These mean relative error values are plotted in Figures 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 together with their corresponding 95% BCa bootstrap confidence intervals for the mean [17].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com