Exact(3)
The differences in bone quantity and quality contributed to lower whole bone stiffness at the radius, and both whole bone and trabecular bone stiffness at the tibia in Hispanic women.
These trabecular differences translated into lower estimated whole bone and trabecular bone stiffness at the tibia in Hispanic than Caucasian women.
After adjusting for BMI, whole bone stiffness at the radius was significantly higher in Caucasian than Hispanic women, while trabecular bone stiffness was similar.
Similar(57)
Despite smaller bone size, thicker cortices and more plate-like trabecular bone in premenopausal Chinese American women led to 14% and 8% greater whole-bone stiffness at the radius and tibia, respectively, versus whites.
In this study, the Sham, LP20 and LP100 groups showed significantly higher bone stiffness at 9 weeks post-treatment compared to the OVX group.
With regard to the individual contribution of various aspects of cortical microarchitecture to whole bone stiffness, cortical TMD was the most significant single predictor of bone stiffness at both radial and tibial sites.
It is possible that early trabecular bone loss in the spine increases the risk of fracture, and that heterogeneous bone stiffness increases the risk [ 17].
As another parameter for bone stiffness we measured the bone volume which did not increase significantly.
We found a significant decline in BMD in the cortical but not the trabecular region, and a reduction in bone strength and stiffness at the contra-lateral side two years after a distal radius fracture.
We observed no correlation between the bone mineralization and stiffness at the microscopic scale either in the oim or in the wild type mice.
Typical load/deflection curves with both the elastic (linear) and plastic components separated by the yielding point as described by Burstein et al. [ 17] were obtained, enabling graphic determination of the following mechanical properties: maximal load, bone stiffness, and energy at failure.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com