Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
Bone samples were fixed in 4% formaldehyde.
After micro-CT scans, the extracted bone samples were fixed in a neutral 10% formaldehyde solution, and the tissue blocks were embedded in a resin for histological analysis.
Bone samples were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, then decalcified in 4% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (pH 7.2) (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA).
All bone samples were fixed in 40% ethanol for 1 week, followed by a series of ethanol dehydration (50-100%) within 6 days.
For histology, trabecular bone samples were fixed in 70% ethanol, processed undecalcified through a graded series of ethanol, embedded in methylmethacrylate resin, and sectioned on a microtome (Polycut-E, Leica SP2600; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), as previously described [ 24, 31].
Biopsies were taken from the iliac crest of adult sheep (∼10 years old; approved by Danish Animal Experiments and Inspectorates, 2011/561-1959) from the study described in Andreasen et al. The bone samples were fixed in 4% buffered formaldehyde for 24 h, before transferring to 0.1% buffered formaldehyde.
Similar(54)
Bone tissue samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight and decalcified in 10% EDTA for 10 days.
Briefly, bone marrow samples were fixed in formalin for 24 h, decalcified, embedded in paraffin, and sliced.
Bone and spleen samples were fixed in 10% formalin, washed with PBS and stored to 80% ethanol.
The bone and synovial membrane samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C and further processed for histology.
The samples were fixed in 4% formaldehyde.
More suggestions(16)
bone slices were fixed
bone samples were treated
bone samples were frozen
bone samples were ground
bone samples were obtained
bone samples were placed
bone samples were analysed
bone samples were harvested
bone blocks were fixed
bone samples were used
bone samples were taken
bone biopsies were fixed
bone samples were dried
bone stumps were fixed
bone samples were allowed
bone samples were embedded
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com