Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
In vivo studies are necessary to investigate the bone response around the Ln2-P3-coated implants.
The roughness of an inserted implant surface is known to have an effect on the bone response around the implant [ 9, 23– 25], with previous reports indicating that an Sa value of about 1.5 μm provides an optimal bone response [ 23, 25].
Similar(58)
Transmission of load axially toward implant followed by posterior load on the ridge initiated a negative consequence on the posterior bone and preservative positive alveolar bone response around osseointegrated implants [82].
The test implants demonstrated a greater bone response histomorphometrically than control implants and the osteoconductivity was more pronounced around the test implant surfaces.
Introduction: Bone response to orthodontic loading was compared histomorphometrically around 2 different types of osseointegrated implants (porous surfaced and machined threaded) to determine their suitability for orthodontic anchorage.
However, the bone response remains uncharacterized.
Introduction: Bone response to orthodontic loading was compared around 2 different types of osseointegrated implants (porous surfaced and machined threaded) to determine the effect of implant surface geometry on regional bone remodeling.
The trend of gradually reducing IL-1β levels around the miniscrew over the period after loading towards baseline is suggestive of adaptive bone response to stimulus.
The trend of gradually reducing IL-1β levels around the mini-screw over the period after loading towards the baseline is suggestive of adaptive bone response to stimulus.
The decline in the levels of IL-1β IL-1βd miniscrew 21 daroundter loading towards the baseline is suggestive of an adaptive bone response to stiminiscrew consequent cessation of active inflammation [5].
After 12 weeks of implantation in a goat femoral condyle model, peri-implant bone response was evaluated in three different zones (inner: 0 500 μm; middle: 500 1000 μm; and outer: 1000 1500 μm) around the implant.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com