Sentence examples for bone loss compared to from inspiring English sources

This prospective study was designed to determine whether patients with prophylaxis-resistant affective disorders, receiving adjunctive maintenance therapy with supraphysiological doses of levothyroxine (l-T4), show evidence of accelerated bone loss compared to the reference population database.

The conical connection leads to a kind of "cold welding" type of connection that seems to prevent bone loss compared to external implant-abutment connections [10, 12].

Possible advantages of short-stemmed femoral prostheses are the reduction of bone loss compared to conventional implants [9, 10, 26, 27, 28], their suitability for less invasive surgery, the potential to avoid stress shielding, and theoretically to enable easier revision surgery [1].

Mice injected with the PC3N-A6-WT cellshowingng dramatically more bone loss compared to those injected with the PC3N-A6-RR cells.

Animals injected with the PC3N-A6-WT cellshoweded increased bone loss compared to those injected with PC3N-A6-RR cells (Fig. 2b).

In contrast, the male PRKO mice and WT littermates had similar bone acquisition from one to six months of age, but the PRKO male mice had less bone resorption and less age-related bone loss compared to WT littermates from 6 12 months of age.

One early study identified that around 10% of children (<18 years) with type 1 diabetes mellitus had increased attachment loss and bone loss compared with controls, despite comparable plaque scores [ 15].

Premenopausal women who develop chemotherapy-induced amenorrhoea have been shown to have rapid bone loss compared with those who retain menstrual function (Saarto et al, 1997; Shapiro et al, 2001; Fuleihan Gel et al, 2005).

For DXA-BMD hip and spine bone loss, using cross-sectional data has been shown to overestimate the rate ofnormal bone loss compared with longitudinal studies [ 37].

The qualitative analysis revealed a tendency favoring the PS technique to prevent or minimize peri-implant marginal bone loss compared with PM technique.

However, within the limits of the recently available publications on randomized controlled clinical trials and prospective clinical cohort studies, the tendency revealing from the studies' results favors the platform switching technique to prevent or minimize peri-implant marginal bone loss, compared with implants with platform matching abutments.