Sentence examples for bone augmentation compared to from inspiring English sources

Sumida et al. investigated custom-made titanium devices for bone augmentation compared to conventional titanium meshes in 26 patients [15].

Esposito et al. [14] researched in their review the beneficial or harmful effects of bone augmentation compared to no augmentation when undertaking a sinus lift procedure.

The biomechanical properties of the restored alveolar crest (or subantral augmentation) and satisfactory long-term implant prognosis are expressed best by higher insertion-torque-values (ITVs) determined at dental implant insertion into the augmented alveolar crest (or subantral augmentation) compared to natural maxillary bone [ 33].

The results could not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the amount of bone formation or graft resorption after maxillary sinus augmentation compared to a placebo medication [40].

The γ-Fe2O3/clay-CPE sensitivity for TSA has shown significant augmentation compared to the other electrodes.

Contrary to native subantral maxillary bone compared to the anterior alveolar crest, the resulting (bio mechanical stability after augmentation with BiSHB (60%HA/40%% bTCP) and MoSHB (100% bTCP), expressed by higher ITVs, reveals to be significantly higher with a significant lesser variance in tHUCSL-INTRALIFT sites compared to the subperiosteal-tunnel-augmentations in the anterior maxilla.

The use of such implants can reduce treatment time, cost, and postoperative morbidity compared to bone augmentation procedures.

In these exposed sites, reduction in mean bone regeneration was observed compared to mesh-retained sites in patients who received simultaneous augmentation and implant placement.

Among the different available augmentation materials, only autologous bone combines osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic characteristics compared to bone substitute and composite materials [3].

There are several advantages of the MIHRA technique compared to conventional bone augmentations.

This leads to earlier dental restorations compared to augmentations using bone substitutes, where the healing periods are often recommended up to 12 months.