Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Though BIA is not a reference measurement, studies comparing body composition measures between BIA and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) show strong correlation (r ≥ 0.80), such that BIA is able to rank-order study participants on FM and FFM.
Multivariable ANOVA determined mean differences in body composition measures between groups adjusted for age and smoking.
There were no statistical differences in anthropometry or body composition measures between those who had repeat measures compared to those that did not.
Similar(57)
There were no significant associations between BMI and femoral head cartilage defects, or between body composition measures and cartilage defects in the central inferomedial region of the femoral head.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to appraise the concordance between body composition measures, and more specifically appendicular lean mass per height square, obtained from the InBody S10 body composition analyzer and those obtained with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Pearson correlation coefficients between all body composition measures were calculated.
Body composition measures (Table 1b) were not different between RA and CON, likewise, no differences in knee extensor muscle strength (Table 1c) measured as one repetition maximum (1 RM) and maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) were observed between groups.
The relationships between BMI and body composition measures and femoral head cartilage volume are shown in Table 2.
The relationships between BMI and body composition measures and femoral head cartilage defects are shown in Table 3.
Multiple linear regression analyses were used to determine the relationships between obesity and body composition measures with femoral head cartilage volume.
A larger study with more men is needed to clarify the gender differences in the relationships between obesity and body composition measures and femoral head cartilage properties.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com