Exact(5)
D and NL boars from NORSVIN's three boar testing stations were included in this study.
Animals used in this study were Duroc (D) and Norwegian Landrace (NL) boars from NORSVIN's three boar testing stations.
In total, data from 1,251 purebred Norwegian Landrace and 918 purebred Duroc male pigs tested in NORSVIN's three boar testing stations were included in this study.
The probability of wild boar testing positive in the iELISA was affected by age (Chi-square = 42.3, 3 d.f., P < 0.001; Figure 3 panel A), age-by-sex interaction, rainfall, Bio-region and month.
During our period of investigation between 2009 and 2012, the boar testing station in Norway [ 19] had a capacity of testing 1152 pigs in 16 separate rooms at the same time.
Similar(55)
None of the seronegative boar tested positive by culture or PCR.
One hundred and four isolates (representing 19.3% of the animals tested) were obtained from these seropositive animals cultured, while only 1 of the 50 iELISA negative wild boar tested resulted in positive culture, being this difference statistically significant (P < 0.001).
A total of 24 boars tested per day is a routine application at Topigs-Norsvin facilities.
In parentheses: 5 Wild boars tested PCR positive for A. phagocytophilum (2 animals in October and 3 in November 2011).
In this study, antibodies to L. intracellularis were observed in 165 of 716 clinically healthy wild boars tested.
Sera from 83 of 112 (74%) boars tested positive for anti-PRRSV antibodies 4 wpi, the 11 boars of which semen was examined in this case study included.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com