Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(4)
Routine Western blotting procedures were used to detect protein content as described10.
Standard western blotting procedures were used as previously described [ 8].
Routine Western blotting procedures were used to detect protein content as described previously [ 30].
Proteins (30 μg/sample) were separated via reducing 10% SDS-PAGE and standard western blotting procedures were used to detect proteins of interest with the following primary antibodies: PDK2 (Cat# AP7039b, Abgent, San Diego, CA, USA), β-actin (Abcam), Noxa (OP180, Calbiochem) and Puma (ab9643, Abcam).
Similar(56)
The same SDS-PAGE and western blot procedures were used to directly detect proteins in 15 µg of total extract prepared in NET-Tx100 lysis buffer or in 1 µg of raft proteins prepared in 6% RIPA buffer.
For Western blotting, standard immunoblotting procedures were used [68].
Similar procedures were used for Western blot expression assessment of TGF-β1 (anti-TGF-β1, Santa Cruz, Biotechnologies, Santa Cruz, USA), phospho-Smad (anti-Smad2, phospho-specific, Calbiochem, Schwabach, Germany) and phospho-ERK (anti-active ERKMAPK, Calbiochem, Schwabach, Germany).
The rest of Western blotting procedure was performed according to the standard method using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody for protein detection with the ECL assay system (GE Healthcare) [30].
Standard western blotting procedures were followed using Tris-glycine SDS-PAGE and electrotransfer onto PVDF membrane at 100 V for 1 h at 4 ºC.
The phage libraries were titred to obtain approximately 500,000 pfu per plate and blotting procedures were performed in duplicate using Nylon membranes (Hybond-N, GE healthcare, UK).
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting procedures were performed as described [19], chemiluminescence using CDP-Star (Roche) or ECL Western blotting detection reagents (GE Healthcare) was detected with Fuji Medical X-ray films (Fujifilm).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com