Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(14)
Blots were analyzed with a Typhoon scanner and ImageQuant software.
Signals in the Western blots were analyzed with ImageJ.
Blots were analyzed with the appropriate antibodies: anti-TH (1∶2000; Millipore), anti-GFAP (1∶2000; Dako, Denmark), anti-Iba1 (1∶1000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-HO-1 (1∶2000; Millipore), anti-NQO1 (1∶500, Abcam), anti-HO-2 (1∶500, Stressgen), anti-GCL-C, anti-GCL-M (both were a kind gift of Dr Terrance Kavanagh, University of Washington, USA) and anti-β-actin (1∶1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
The blots were analyzed with densitometry using Image J software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Blots were analyzed with an Amersham Biosciences Typhoon 8600 phosphor imaging system.
The densities of protein blots were analyzed with Labworks Software (Ultra-Violet ProdUKts, UK).
Similar(46)
The density of the blots was analyzed with a densitometric software (Bio-Rad), which quantifies the intensity of the bands.
To analyze this phenomenon in more detail, a similar blot was analyzed with a rabbit serum raised against PM/Scl-75.
Western blotting was analyzed with Alex680- and IR700-conjugated secondary antibodies in a two-color LI-COR Odyssey Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA).
Western blots were analyzed using image densitometry with TotalLab TL100 software (Nonlinear Dynamics, Durhan, USA).
Western blotting images were analyzed with Image J program (National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA).
More suggestions(18)
patches were analyzed with
blots were calibrated with
blots were reacted with
blots was analyzed with
blots were revealed with
blots were quantitated with
blots were probed with
blots were stripped with
blots were hybridized with
blots were generated with
blots were normalized with
blots were restripped with
blots were reprobed with
blots were incubated with
blots were visualized with
blots were performed with
blots were developed with
blots were quantified with
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com