The difference between the preferences of the first and second test blocks was not significant in either condition (Push: Wilcoxon matched-pair test: n = 12, T = 5.00, p = 1.0; pull: Wilcoxon matched pair test: n = 14, T = 9.00, p = 0.21).
Post hoc analysis of separate groups revealed that decrease of the response time in consecutive blocks was significant in all groups except LU, where the decrease from the third and fourth task blocks was not significant (P = 0.40).
HB814 was found to be associated with indica genotypes' resistance to PXO112 but SNPs in this haplotype block was not significant in the single SNP association.
If block was not significant, we performed a single factor ANOVA.
This group difference developed early in practice and was present throughout the whole practice phase with the interaction of age and block being not significant, F<1.
Analyses of discriminability across early blocks revealed that there were no discernable differences in the patterns of learning for each task, as the interaction between task and block was not significant, F(12, 216) = 1.54, p > 0.01.
As the interaction with block was not significant, the two ratios were averaged for each rat, and a one sample t-test established that the ratio differed from 1 in Experiment 3a, p = .02, but not in Experiment 3b, p = .54.54
Block effect were not significant whether for all ants (p = 0. 43) or when just native species were considered (p = 0. 13).
Other interactions regarding the probe block data were not significant, nor was the main effect of CONDITION, suggesting that the overall RTs did not differ across conditions.
Differences in the familiarity ratings were significant within the valence block (p<0.01) and as well as within the arousal block (p<0.01), but were not significant between the two blocks (Kruskal-Wallis tests).
