Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Phased genotypes were partitioned into haplotype blocks using the solid spine algorithm implemented in the software Haploview, version 4.1 [ 24].
Similar(59)
The haplotype blocks were defined using the solid spine of LD approach, using Haploview's internal tagging program.
A block is derived using the solid spine algorithm, and defined as that the first and last SNPs in a region are in strong LD (D ' ≥ 0.8) with all intermediate SNPs.
A block is derived using the solid spine algorithm, and defined as that the first and last SNPs in a region are in strong LD (D' ≥0.8) with all intermediate SNPs, but the intermediate SNPs are not necessarily in LD with each other.
We used Haploview version 4.0 to evaluate blocks of linkage disequilibrium (LD) using the 'Solid Spine of LD' algorithm with a minimum D' value of 0.8.
The hearing levels of the ALSPAC subjects are listed in Table 2.> Haploview was used to calculate the number of LD blocks in the SNPs studied, using the solid spine of LD option [ 26].
This project was approved by the NIH protocol 01-DC-0230, reviewed by the NIH/NINDS CNS Blue Panel IRB and complied with the Helsinki Declaration of Ethical Principles.> Haploview [ 33] was used to identify Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) patterns and haplotype blocks at the selected loci using the solid spine approach.
The pattern of LD was defined using the solid spine of LD (D'>0.8) to form haplotype blocks.
Next, the preparation of RNA with the novel 2′-SCF3 uridine building block was tested, using the solid-phase synthesis methodology for 2′- O-TOM-protected RNA.
Linkage disequilibrium values are given by R. The haplotype blocks were estimated using the 'solid spine of LD' method, which defines haplotype blocks by the first and the last SNPs being in strong linkage disequilibrium with all intermediate markers.
Haploview identified five LD blocks (black solid lines) using the confidence interval method (Gabriel et al. 2002).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com