Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Dependences of blocking temperature on the thickness of shells are shown in Fig. 6h.
Similar(59)
The dependence of blocking temperature on interparticle spacing was found to point toward a much more dramatic interdependence at close interparticle spacing, and a weaker correlation at larger spacing.
In general, one can say that the blocking temperature of the system depends on the particle size on the one hand.
h Dependence of blocking temperature Tb on the thickness of shells.
Hence, the first possible reason of "superspin" freezing can be excluded from consideration and, for all ribbons studied, the blocking temperature marks the onset of interparticle interaction on cooling.
The so-called blocking temperature TB depends strongly on the particle size of the infiltrated iron oxide NPs and on the distance between the particles within the tubes.
Given our previous observation of thickness-dependent dissolution behavior for these nanotubes in aqueous media [3], this parameter can be paired with a target blocking temperature and selected based on the desired degradation window in vivo.
And it was observed that the blocking temperature (T B) strongly depends on nanocomposite size, the enhancement of the effective magnetic anisotropy with respect to the bulk γ-Fe2O3 can be considered as coming fundamentally from surface anisotropy [119].
The FC/ZFC curves obtained at different temperatures shown in Figure 4a clearly shows the presence of blocking temperature (T B) around 100 K. On the other hand, the lack of hysteresis at room temperature is evident from Figure 4b.
The exchange coupling, the single-ion anisotropy, the transverse field and the external magnetic field have important effects on the blocking temperature.
A systematic investigation of the nanotube wall thickness on blocking temperature is currently under evaluation, but studies to date suggest that the magnetic properties can be tuned by the filling of the SiNTs independent of the nanotube wall thickness.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com