To cover various error propagation, each block is tested with random transmission errors propagated from prediction block and concealment block, respectively.
The extent of sensory block was tested with a pinprick method, and the degree of motor blockade was assessed using the modified Bromage scale [ 6, 8].
One FFPE block was tested with a single kit lot due to insufficient RNA mass from the isolation for the second lot.
After sitting for 10 min, the level of sensory block was tested with the alcohol swab and the level of a motor block was assessed with the Bromage score.
All six combinations of manual/ATO/low adhesion ATO and lineside/moving block signalling were tested with the revised train performance and line speeds.
Further, plain beads (3.8 × 10), which were activated but no Mab was added, and plain beads (3.8 × 10) which did not contain Mab but were blocked with BSA were tested with 100 pg OTA and no OTA was found in the dissociated fraction.
The subjects were tested with 4 blocks (each block comprised of two interleaved staircases, one with matched-amplitude vibrations and one with matched-energy vibrations).
Our mixed design did not permit us to make within subject comparisons therefore, between-condition differences (muscle protein synthesis, anabolic signaling, and gene expression) were tested with a blocked two-factor (condition × time) analysis of variance with repeated measures on time statistics.
When the same samples were tested with a blocking peptide, both full length as well as the lower bands disappeared completely, suggesting that the lower bands are related to cereblon protein (Fig 3 lower panel).
To assess changes in SSEP amplitude between blocks 1 and 2, SSEP N20-P25 amplitudes were tested with a repeated-measure ANOVA with group factor "subjects". Tukey's test was used for post hoc analyses.
