Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(25)
Blinded expert review of ultrasound images was performed by two board certified cardiologists and one ultrasound fellowship trained emergency physician.
Blinded expert POEM scores were also validated against offline computer analysis of the same clips using traditional microcirculatory parameters, and the time taken to assign each was recorded.
The optimal parameters were chosen by way of visual assessment of the reconstructed phantom images by a blinded expert nuclear medicine physician.
The images acquired by expert guidance and by autonomous subjects were reviewed by a blinded expert who was only informed of the anatomic region (i.e. shoulder, knee, ankle, etc).
Ultimately, after visual assessment of the reconstructed phantom images by the blinded expert nuclear medicine physician, the optimal parameters selected were the maximum number of iterations and subsets (16i × 16s) but with a 12-mm filter.
Compared to blinded expert reviewer interpretation of ultrasound images, the treating physicians had an excellent sensitivity and specificity in detecting left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (93.6 and 100%%, respectively) (Table 3), and agreement in assessing the severity of LV dysfunction was excellent (kappa = 0.98, p = <0.001).
Similar(35)
Every attempt was made to minimize subjectivity by giving clear written guidelines to each expert, blinding the experts to the notification outcome, preventing experts from discussing the events, and deriving agreement mathematically.
These three experts were blinded to the experts' consensus.
However, by blinding this expert for the origin of the switching suggestions (pharmacist or CDSS) bias is minimised.
The use of more than one expert, blinded or unblinded, in each patient will strengthen the study.
Furthermore, the exposure assessment was blinded, so the expert did not know about the outcome, when assessing the exposure.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com