"blind sampling" is a grammatically correct phrase and can be used in written English.
It refers to the method of choosing a random sample from a population without any bias or predetermined selection criteria. Example: The researchers conducted a blind sampling of the participants, ensuring that each individual had an equal chance of being selected for the study.
We demonstrate the performance of electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), dipole electromagnetic profiling (DEMP), and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy for identification of subsurface sediment bodies of contrasting lithology, age, and pollution status; we found minor remnants of unpolluted (ancient) floodplain segments that would likely have been overlooked in arbitrary "blind" sampling.
One of the problems with search — and all the guys who do search testing will tell you this– it doesn't matter what the results look like if you have a testing group sort of blind sampling.
For example, the power spectrum blind sampling (PSBS) method used in[9] and[10] demonstrated poor estimation performance in inactive bands, which also led to high complexity in matrix operations.
Two specimens from each of the seven species and hybrid catfish (except C. bouderius and H. macropterus) were randomly selected by a third party for a blind sample test; with the blind sampling test yielding 100% correct species identification results.
To test the efficiency of DNA barcoding as a species identification tool, a blind sampling test was conducted, in which samples, identity unknown except to the submitting individual, were selected and sequenced.
As blind sampling was carried out, 922 out of 1,313 farms were sampled once, and the resting 391 farms were sampled from 2 to 5 times.
That date was confirmed by researchers at the University of Adelaide, who tested a blind sample, and at New Zealand's Waikato University.
Hybridization of the array with blind samples resulted in 100% correct calls, and no false positive.
Participants bring in blind samples of historical data to see if Searchspace's sentinels plant red flags in all the right places.
The poster presentation showed that people who claimed to be sensitive to gluten were actually able to tell which of the blind samples contained gluten.
Then, 39 blind samples, including 27 tissues of mice infected with Y. pestis and 12 tissues of healthy mice as negative control, were detected with the FOB-3.
