Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
On the basis of our data, we derived an algorithm, represented in Table 2, with a sensitivity ranging from 80% for TC to 90% for AC, as determined in our sample of 29 carcinoid tumours and assuming the double blind revision as a reference (Supplementary Table 4).
Similar(59)
Blind, blind?
So it seems that we have a metacognitive blind spot for which revision strategies will work best.
Since visual input interruption occurs prior to the stage of synaptic revision in early blind and after its establishment in late blind subjects, this might further contribute to explain the discrepancies between the two studies.
Articles were evaluated in full text by at least 2 independent reviewers, and their results were cross-checked by an independent reviewer who was blind regarding their results and revision rates.
Only few studies specified the interpretation of the normal coronary angiograms, like revision of the CAG films, blinded observation, or interpretation by more reviewers.
All coders were blinded to the subjects' baseline information, and the International Classification of Disease 9th revision (ICD-9) was used to classify the causes of death [ 11– 13].
It is still telling, however, that such a blind spot needed to be pointed out, another sign that ongoing revisions of our deep gender assumptions will require much time and great effort by both men and women.
Psychiatrist Allen Frances, who chaired the task force that produced the fourth revision of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV), urges caution, not blind optimism, for the moment.
All reported adverse health outcomes in the offspring of GWV and NGWV were coded to the 10th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD10) [ 17], the coder being blind to the deployment status of the parent.
However, as revision surgery (the primary outcome) is objective, it is expected that a lack of blinding will not introduce significant threats to validity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com