Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
The status quo is reinforced by the blind reviewing of articles by those who know the convention, expect certain styles and approaches and enforce these.
Blind reviewing with scoring helped to reduce this effect, especially with the good agreement between the two readers.
Similar(58)
This issue marks the beginning of blind reviewed articles.
The sections were blind reviewed by a neuropathologist.
The sections were blind reviewed by a neuropathologist and scored semiquantitatively for tumor size.
Blinding to authors, institution or journal title was not done, given the contradictory evidence relating blinded reviewing and bias [ 10]; additionally, two reviewers (JG and SC) were very familiar with the literature.
This work is an extension of the paper "[this information has been removed for the double-blind reviewing process]".
Finally, I am more inclined to review for journals with double-blind reviewing practices and journals that are run by academic societies, because those are both things that I want to support and encourage.
This open access initiative combined with our unique double-blind reviewing process and the fact that we remain the only journal specializing in applied evolutionary biology reaffirms our status among the most innovative journals in the field.
This is done primarily through carefully crafted scoring criteria, blinded reviewing, and prevention of conflicts of interest.
I can blind-review a journal paper just fine, but I dread assessing students' assignments or being asked questions at conferences.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com