Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
This issue marks the beginning of blind reviewed articles.
The sections were blind reviewed by a neuropathologist.
The sections were blind reviewed by a neuropathologist and scored semiquantitatively for tumor size.
Similar(57)
The status quo is reinforced by the blind reviewing of articles by those who know the convention, expect certain styles and approaches and enforce these.
Blind reviewing with scoring helped to reduce this effect, especially with the good agreement between the two readers.
Blinding to authors, institution or journal title was not done, given the contradictory evidence relating blinded reviewing and bias [ 10]; additionally, two reviewers (JG and SC) were very familiar with the literature.
I can blind-review a journal paper just fine, but I dread assessing students' assignments or being asked questions at conferences.
This work is an extension of the paper "[this information has been removed for the double-blind reviewing process]".
Finally, I am more inclined to review for journals with double-blind reviewing practices and journals that are run by academic societies, because those are both things that I want to support and encourage.
Immunohistochemical slides from all the cases were blind-reviewed by three expert pathologists (Alessandro Del Gobbo, Stefano Ferrero, and Lucia Ferrari).
This is done primarily through carefully crafted scoring criteria, blinded reviewing, and prevention of conflicts of interest.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com