blanket judgements

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "blanket judgements" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to broad, sweeping conclusions made about a group or situation without considering individual differences or nuances. Example: "Making blanket judgements about people based on their appearance can lead to misunderstandings and reinforce stereotypes."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Though attempting blanket judgements for anything so large and diverse as human religions seems to me an invitation to overstatement, a different issue.

Biology and Philosophy

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The expectation is that the court will reaffirm its previous judgement, namely that a blanket ban on prisoners voting is illegal.

BBC

Q magazine, having given the album a five-star rave review on its release, admitted in 2007 that Be Here Now is often thought of as "a disastrous, overblown folly the moment when Oasis, their judgement clouded by drugs and blanket adulation, ran aground on their own sky-high self-belief".

Wikipedia

For over six years, political considerations have deflected the UK government from complying with an unequivocal judgement by the European court of human rights (Hirst v UK 2004) that the blanket ban on prisoners' voting is unlawful.

The Guardian - Opinion

Shrewd, informed judgements.

The New Yorker

These are editorial judgements.

The New York Times

Quantitative judgements don't apply.

The Guardian - Opinion

The crowd chanted: "False judgements.

The Guardian

Fourth – make your own judgements.

The Guardian - Tech

Facts make judgements correct.

SEP

Blanket ban?

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "blanket judgements", ensure that you acknowledge the potential for oversimplification and consider specifying the context or limitations of the judgement.

Common error

Be cautious about applying "blanket judgements" without considering individual differences or specific circumstances; this can lead to unfair or inaccurate conclusions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "blanket judgements" functions as a noun phrase where "blanket" acts as an adjective modifying "judgements". It typically describes broad or sweeping assessments that do not account for individual variations. Examples from Ludwig show it used in contexts discussing moral issues or legal bans.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

34%

Science

33%

Wiki

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "blanket judgements" describes wide-ranging assessments that may lack nuance. Ludwig AI identifies the phrase as grammatically correct but relatively uncommon, appearing in news, scientific, and wiki contexts. When writing, it's crucial to acknowledge the limitations of such judgements and consider potential oversimplifications. Alternatives like "sweeping generalizations" or "broad generalizations" can be used depending on the specific context. While the phrase is acceptable, caution should be exercised to avoid unfair or inaccurate conclusions based on overly broad categorizations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sweeping generalizations

Focuses on the act of making broad statements without specific evidence.

broad generalizations

Similar to 'sweeping generalizations' but emphasizes the extensive scope.

overarching conclusions

Highlights the all-encompassing nature of the judgements.

general assessments

Emphasizes the overall evaluation without detailed analysis.

wholesale condemnations

Focuses on complete disapproval without exceptions.

undifferentiated evaluations

Highlights a lack of distinction in the judgements made.

indiscriminate appraisals

Stresses that appraisals are made without careful selection or distinction.

universal declarations

Emphasizes statements that apply to everyone or everything.

comprehensive verdicts

Indicates judgements that cover all aspects of a situation.

blanket statements

Refers to the making of comprehensive assertions covering all cases.

FAQs

What does "blanket judgements" mean?

The term "blanket judgements" refers to broad or sweeping assessments or conclusions applied to an entire group or situation without considering individual differences or nuances.

How can I use "blanket judgements" in a sentence?

You might say, "Making "blanket judgements" about people based on their appearance can lead to misunderstandings and reinforce stereotypes."

What are some alternatives to "blanket judgements"?

Alternatives include "sweeping generalizations", "broad generalizations", or "overarching conclusions", depending on the context.

When is it appropriate to use "blanket judgements"?

While it's generally better to avoid generalizations, using "blanket judgements" might be acceptable when outlining a general trend or policy, but always acknowledge potential exceptions and limitations.