bisected in half

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "bisected in half" is not correct because "bisected" already implies dividing something into two equal parts, making "in half" redundant.
You can use it when discussing the division of an object or concept into two equal parts, but it would be better to simply say "bisected." Example: "The line was bisected to create two equal segments."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Skin biopsy specimens were bisected in half.

British Journal of Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

A man's head is bisected in profile.

The Guardian - Arts

The unitary authority is bordered to the northwest and bisected in the northeast by the Thames.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The brains were bisected in the sagittal plane.

Alzheimer's Research and Therapy

All resected lymph node were bisected in largest dimension.

BMC Cancer

The presentation of the results is bisected in the two observed years.

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

Brains were rapidly removed and bisected in the mid-sagittal plane.

ASN Neuro

The brains were rapidly removed and bisected in the midsagittal plane.

Alzheimer's Research and Therapy

At 0, 248 48 and 72 h, tumors were fixed in 10% formalin in PBS, bisected, then each half was embedded in paraffin and sectioned.

Plosone

Tumours were dissected post mortem, bisected and half was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C.

British Journal of Cancer

Each cecum was bisected and half used for culture after rinsing out the contents and then soaking the tissue in gentamicin 20mg/L for 30 minutes at room temperature.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer the term "bisected" on its own. It already implies division into two equal parts, making "in half" unnecessary and redundant.

Common error

Don't use "bisected in half". The word "bisected" already means to divide into two equal parts, so adding "in half" is repetitive.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "bisected in half" functions as a descriptive term indicating the action of dividing something into two equal portions. However, as Ludwig AI points out, the term is technically redundant.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Wiki

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "bisected in half" means to divide something into two equal parts. However, Ludwig AI advises that it is grammatically incorrect due to redundancy, as "bisected" already implies division into two equal parts. While examples can be found in various sources, including scientific publications and news media, it's best to use the word "bisected" alone for clarity and precision. Alternatives include "divided in half" or "cut in half", but the single word "bisected" is the preferred and most accurate choice.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

bisected

This is the correct and concise term, eliminating the redundant "in half".

bisected equally

While technically redundant (since bisecting implies equality), this emphasizes the equal nature of the division.

divided in half

This alternative uses simpler language but is less precise than "bisected".

halved

A single word meaning to divide into two halves.

cut in half

This is a common, informal way to describe dividing something into two pieces.

split in half

Similar to "cut in half", but implies a more forceful separation.

divided into two equal parts

More explicit about the result of the division.

separated into two halves

Emphasizes the separation resulting from the division.

sectioned in half

Implies a structured division, often in scientific contexts.

cleaved in two

Suggests a sharp division, possibly with force.

FAQs

What does "bisected" mean?

The word "bisected" means to divide something into two equal parts.

Is it correct to say "bisected in half"?

No, it's redundant. The word "bisected" already implies dividing something in half. It is better to simply use "bisected".

What are some alternatives to "bisected in half"?

Instead of "bisected in half", you can use "bisected", "divided in half", or "cut in half" depending on the context.

In what contexts might I encounter the phrase "bisected in half"?

While grammatically incorrect, you might encounter "bisected in half" in informal writing or speech. However, it is more precise to use just "bisected", especially in formal or scientific contexts.