Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(11)
Thus, a total of 96 biopsy specimens were evaluated.
All biopsy specimens were evaluated by a single experienced uropathologist (AC).
Liver biopsy specimens were evaluated according to the previously validated Metavir scoring system.
Antral biopsy specimens were evaluated for the presence of H. pylori by culture.
All renal biopsy specimens were evaluated with immunofluorescence, light-, and electron microscopy.
CD8+ TIL and FOXP3+ TIL in residual tumors and biopsy specimens were evaluated by double-staining immunohistochemistry.
Similar(49)
Each biopsy specimen was evaluated for the presence or absence of the histopathologic characteristics presented in Table 1.
Allograft rejection was defined as biopsy proven rejection (specimens were evaluated by light microscopy and immunofluorescence staining for C4d) and classified according to Banff classification as updated in 2007.
Up to seven small-bowel biopsy specimens were taken from the distal part of the duodenum upon upper gastrointestinal endoscopy; the specimens were evaluated by the same investigator without prior knowledge of the history or findings.
Thirty-seven patients with biopsy-proven breast cancer underwent duct endoscopy, with direct visualization of the ducts, and lavage; the specimens were evaluated using MSP.
Specimens were evaluated microscopically.
More suggestions(18)
biopsy specimens were analyzed
biopsy specimens were put
biopsy specimens were fixed
biopsy specimens were received
biopsy cores were evaluated
biopsy specimens were procured
biopsy slides were evaluated
biopsy specimens were shipped
biopsy specimens were processed
biopsy specimens were bisected
biopsy specimens were microarrayed
biopsy specimens were collected
biopsy specimens were obtained
biopsy specimens were stored
biopsy specimens were stained
biopsy sections were evaluated
biopsy specimens were used
biopsy specimens were determined
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com