Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(15)
All biological replicates were run in triplicate for each transcript.
Three biological replicates were run for each condition.
These two biological replicates were run twice using this setup as technical replicates.
Four biological replicates were run, each sampled from 15 individual plants.
Three independent biological replicates were run and the significance was determined with SPSS software (p < 0.05).
Three biological replicates were run for each isolate (except A-2A, for which one run failed).
Similar(45)
All samples for each biological replicate were run in duplicates and checked for intra-run variation and, if needed, analyzed again.
Three gels, one from each biological replicate, were run from each sampling date.
Three 2-D DIGE gels (technical replicates) of each biological replicate were run as described by Lu et al. [ 51] with some modifications.
Subsequently, each biological replicate was run in triplicate technical replicates for QT-PCR analyses.
At least three biological replicates (i.e., samples recovered from three different mice or three different in vitro cultures) of each condition were tested, and each biological replicate was run at least twice.
More suggestions(21)
biological replicate was run
biological replicates were collected
biological replicates were obtained
biological replicates was run
biological markers were run
biological replicates were analysed
biological replicates were grown
biological replicates were performed
biological replicates were conducted
biological replicates were generated
biological replicates were normalized
biological replicates were set
biological replicates were done
biological samples were run
biological dads were run
biological replicates were measured
biological replicates were analyzed
biological replicates were used
biological replicates were utilized
biological replications were run
biological replicates were peformed
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com