Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
The averages of biological replicates were compared for the different strains and summarized as pie charts (Fig. 2 a).
The three biological replicates were compared.
Expression levels obtained from four independent biological replicates were compared using FlexArray 1.1 software [ 15].
Upon meeting these criteria the independent biological replicates were compared, resolving 1016 SARs and 775 MARs along chromosome 16.
Four biological replicates were compared: in all four the normoxic samples were labeled with Cy3 and the hypoxic samples were labeled with Cy5.
Similar(55)
The mean RPKM of three biological replicates was compared among different samples.
Next, the reproducibility between biological replicates was compared among MICC, ChIA-PET tool and ChiaSig.
The observed technical reproducibility is very high and variability may be higher when two biological replicates are compared.
To select differentially expressed genes, the average of two biological replicates was compared between the conditions examined.
Samples compared are described in row 1 (eg. "OV_vs_TE") Mean read intensity (from two biological replicates) was compared between samples using DESeq and adjusted p-value (padj).
For sporulation assays determined with the microscopic method, the mean percent sporulation in the presence of antibiotic from 3 biological replicates was compared with the corresponding control without antibiotic.
More suggestions(17)
biological replicates were combined
biological replicates were measured
biological repeats were compared
biological replicates were differentiated
biological variables were compared
biological replicates were shown
biological activities were compared
biological replicates were investigated
biological properties were compared
biological processes were compared
biological replicates were sampled
biological measures were compared
biological replicates were analysed
biological replicates were performed
biological replicates were conducted
biological data were compared
biological replicates were prepared
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com