Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(52)
Three biological replicates were collected for each stage.
Three biological replicates were collected at the same time.
mRNA and PolyRibo-3′ RNA-sequencing data from 4 biological replicates were collected to estimate variation and ensure reproducibility.
A total of five biological replicates were collected every 24 h during the time course (from day 0 to day 6) both in drought and watered conditions, and for each genotype (WT, quad, and BRL3ox).
Transcriptomes of mouse lens spanning seven developmental stages (three embryonic; E15, E15.5, E18 and four postnatal; P0, P3, P6, P9 stages with biological replicates) were collected from published sources for our study.
Three biological replicates were collected for each time point.
Similar(8)
RNA from two biological replicates was collected for each strain and condition.
Then, 1−4 µg of total RNA from three biological replicates was collected.
Root tissue of two biological replicates was collected at two iron concentrations (10 and 300 μM) in order to determine the differences in the transcriptome of B73 and Mo17.
Cells (40 ml for each biological replicate) were collected via centrifugation, and RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini kits (Qiagen), followed by amplification with MessageAmp-II Bacteria RNA amplification kit (Ambion).
Samples for each biological replicate were collected from three maize plants and combined.
More suggestions(15)
biological replicates were set
biological replicates were done
biological results were collected
biological samples were collected
biological replicates were analyzed
biological replicates were obtained
biological tubes were collected
biological replicates were analysed
biological replicates were grown
biological replicates were performed
biological reps were collected
biological replicates were conducted
biological specimens were collected
biological replicates were generated
biological replicates were normalized
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com