Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
High quality RNA isolated from three independent tissue samples (biological replicates) was pooled for library preparation.
For each experiment, tissue from three biological replicates was pooled in.
The RNA of the biological replicates was pooled, lyophilized, and stored using the RNAstable® Tube Kit (Biomatrica, San Diego, CA, USA).
For sequencing, in case of each sample (0, 4, 8, and 12 DAP of Sitaphal or NMK-1), the equivalent quantity of total RNA of three biological replicates was pooled.
RNA quantity and quality was checked using bioanalyzer, and RNA from the 3 biological replicates was pooled in equal proportion to obtain one representative total RNA sample per phenotype (each made from 180 individuals).
For each sample, an equal amount of amplified mRNA from the three biological replicates was pooled for ds-cDNA synthesis following the protocol developed by the Schnable lab [ 52].
Similar(54)
Briefly, RNA samples from the four biological replicates were pooled together, and subjected to DNase I treatment (Ambion, Cat. No. AM1907) until no DNA could be detected by qPCR.
For each experimental variant 2-4 biological replicates were pooled.
Three biological replicates were pooled in preparation of each of the six final samples.
Equal amounts of RNA from three biological replicates were pooled prior to cDNA preparation.
Biological replicates were pooled to make representative samples for deep sequencing analysis.
More suggestions(16)
biological replicates was observed
biological replicates was presented
biological replicates was obtained
biological replicates was measured
biological replicates was determined
biological replicates was analyzed
biological replicates was hybridized
biological replicates was accepted
biological replicates was scored
biological replicates was evaluated
biological replicates was diluted
biological replicates was sequenced
biological replicates was used
biological replicates was estimated
biological replicates was conducted
biological replicates was validated
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com