Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Each biological replicate was evaluated in an identical but independent experiment performed on a seven-day interval.
Similar(59)
The quality of the biological replicates was evaluated by Pearson coefficient, which ranged from 0.87 to 0.98.
Correlation between biological replicates was evaluated using Pearson's correlation (Additional file 2: Table S10, Table S11).
The quality of the biological replicates was evaluated by the R-squared coefficient [see Additional file 2], which ranged from 0.89 to 0.99.
Two biological replicates were evaluated throughout the analysis.
For all studies, a minimum of five biological replicates were evaluated and at least 200 cells per sample were counted.
Thus, three biological replicates were evaluated for chilling and salinity stresses as well as for control plants.
qRT-PCR was performed in duplicate for each sample and at least two biological replicates were evaluated for each gene tested.
Different allocations of biological and technical replicates were evaluated by minimizing the variance of the ratio of technical variance (measurement error) to the total variance (sum of sampling error and measurement error).
Datasets of processed signal intensities from biological and technical replicates were evaluated with Pearson's coefficient of correlation (R) using MS Excel 2007 (Microsoft, Redmond, USA).
Each biological replicate was assessed in three technical replicates.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com