Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Clinical and biological parameters were compared in these two groups.
Clinical, histological and biological parameters were compared using the chi-square test.
Clinical, histological and biological parameters were compared using the χ test.
Secondly, texture, kinetic, BI-RADS and biological parameters were compared in NR vs PR + CR individually.
The biological parameters were compared by either the Spearman rank correlation coefficient for continuous variables or by χ statistic.
Clinical, histological and biological parameters were compared using the most appropriate test from among the Spearman correlation coefficient, χ test, Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal Wallis H test. Disease-free and overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method, and comparison of study groups was performed using the log-rank test.
Similar(52)
Clinical and biological continuous parameters were compared with the Mann-Whitney test.
All patients were treated according to EBIC guidelines and epidemiological, clinical, biological, evolutive parameters were compared to these of the 312 other patients with standard traumatic lesions (STL).
Biological or clinical parameters were compared using conditional logistic regression [ 21].
Multiple parameters were compared between WT and GluN2C KO mice.
Discrete parameters were compared using the Student test.
More suggestions(17)
biological parameters were assessed
biological parameters were evaluated
biological variables were compared
biological parameters were measured
biological parameters were estimated
biological parameters were analyzed
biological parameters were based
biological activities were compared
biological parameters were carried
biological properties were compared
biological processes were compared
biological parameters were found
biological parameters were extracted
biological parameters were investigated
biological data were compared
biological parameters were tested
biological parameters were transmitted
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com