Sentence examples for binding when compared to from inspiring English sources

Removal of the C-terminus distal of HBD-3 (Vn80–373) had no significant effect on binding when compared to Vn80 396.

Each of the analysed affinity matured scFvs showed an increased binding when compared to the original scFv IIB6.

Little or no binding was seen for both Lea and Lex under environmental conditions, with many other fucosylated structures showing reduced binding when compared to bacteria grown under host-like conditions.

A comparison of mean fluorescent intensity of cortical neurons in these WT mice show a significant decrease (p<0.01) in F-Aβ40 H13,14G binding when compared to F-Aβ40 (Figure 2A, B, and E).

However, HESC cell nuclei have cofactors that promote the binding of recombinant ERα to target DNA in EMSA and these factors enhance binding when compared to recombinant ERα alone (rERα, Affinity Bioreagents).

However, deletion of N1 has a pronounced affect on the position of the N-domain relative to the G-domain upon nucleotide binding when compared to either apo FtsY, FtsY GMPPNP or FtsY GMPPCP from the targeting complex with Ffh (Figure 5 and Figure 6).

Further deletions showed that the region 415 to 461 of PIASy was critical for association with VHL, although the central region (aa 233 to 415) showed similar binding affinity when compared to the complete loss of binding with the mutant containing only the first 233 residues (aa 1 to 233) (Figure 4A, lane 3, 4).

Scanning the upstream regions of genes in the Meta-UP dataset resulted in the identification of 32 transcription factors (TFs) with significantly enriched numbers of binding sites when compared to the distribution of transcription factor binding sites found in randomly picked sequences (chi2 test).

The reported de novo mutations lead to more flexibility and increased binding energy when compared to WT, recessive mutations lead to intermediate binding efficiency and polymorphic variants have no effect.

The deduced amino acid sequence showed 93% identity in the DNA-binding domain and 72% identity in the ligand binding domain when compared to Aplysia estrogen receptor.

KatA1 49 did not show any binding to Vn and, accordingly, KatA51 505 was not impaired in binding Vn when compared to the full-length protein (Fig. 5b).