Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Similar(60)
To measure the strength of interaction between the two peptides in the c-Fos c-Jun and c-Fos c-Jun c-Fos c-Junthe andolute free energy of binding was c-Jun c-Junusing the MM/GBSA method.
The chemical shift of the PHD1KDM5B backbone atoms amide 1H and 15N after H3K4me0 peptide binding was calculated using the following equation: Δ δ av = 0.5 × Δ δ ( NH) 2 + 0.2 × Δ δ 15 N 2 1 / 2. (B) Ribbon representation of free PHD1KDM5B.
The percentage of binding was calculated using the formulation: % = 100* OD450 of labeled scFvFc + unlabeled scFvFc)/(OD450 of labeled scFvFc + PBS).
The cumulative binding was calculated using equation (2) as described previously.
The percentage in vitro binding or nonspecific binding was calculated using the following equation: percentage binding=(γ after incubation/ γ before incubation) × 100.
The total surface area available for IO- MHPC binding was calculated using the average size of PCPP nanospheres and found to be 123.2 cm/mg polymer.
Free energy of binding was calculated using a previously reported model, where the substrate analogue 5′-CCA-Ala was docked into the isolated INS domain (residues 242 388) of Ef ProRS.
The number of binding sites and binding constants were calculated using a double logarithm regression equation.
The partial charges for the ligand binding site were calculated using the MMFF94x force field and the ligand partial charges were calculated with AM1BCC charges [51, 52].
The binding constants were calculated using Origin provided by ITC200.
The kinetic binding parameters were calculated using the software of the manufacturer.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com