Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
Non-specific antibody binding was inhibited with 10% FCS in PBS for 25 minutes.
Non-specific binding was inhibited with normal goat serum.
Nonspecific binding was inhibited with normal goat serum for 30 min.
Immunofluorescence was used in detection of Bcl-2 expressing plasma cells Sections were pre-treated as described above and non-specific binding was inhibited with TBS buffer containing 2% BSA, 10% normal serum and 0.5% TritonX.
After cooling slides on ice and two water rinses, intrinsic peroxidase activity was blocked by incubation with 5%H2O22 in PBS for 20 min. Non-specific antibody binding was inhibited with 10% FCS in PBS for 20 min. For the Dab2 stain, this was followed by incubation with mouse anti-Dab2 IgG1, (BD, 610465) at 1/100, in the same block for 12 hours at 4 degrees.
Similar(55)
Furthermore, testosterone-binding was inhibited with varying testosterone concentrations (0.75-50 μM, data not shown).
FIV PPR SU-Fc bound strongly to 3201, but the binding was inhibited when pretreated with CXCR4 inhibitor AMD3100 (Figure 1A, right panel).
This binding was inhibited by competition with 100xELP.
The binding was inhibited by 87.9% with 1, 000 µg/ml of soluble heparin.
This result is in line with our previous reports that binding was inhibited when surface epitopes were blocked by excess antibody applied before AFM was performed [19, 32].
Since MCHR1-rich regions are blocked with the unlabeled SNAP-7941 and, therefore, specific MCHR1-targeted binding was inhibited, an unspecific tracer uptake in the whole brain was observed.
More suggestions(14)
binding was precipitated with
binding was found with
binding was associated with
binding was revealed with
binding was assessed with
binding was examined with
binding was determined with
binding was obtained with
binding was observed with
binding was seen with
binding was blocked with
binding was visualised with
binding was performed with
binding was done with
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com