Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
Specific [11C](R -PK11195 binding was expR -PK11195binding potential relative to nondisplaceable binding (BP ND) as followas B P ND = f ND B max / K d = k 3 / k 4. whexpressed is the receptor density, K d is the asfinity, and f ND is the free fraction of ligand in the nondisplaceabindingsue compotential[19].
Data for bacterial binding was expressed as CFU/well.
Competitor binding was expressed as a percentage of maximal specific binding.
The inhibition of PDGF-BB ligand receptor binding was expressed as the percentage decrease in optical density (OD 450 nm).
For the primary cell cultures, the cellular binding was expressed as the fraction of activity administered per well.
Antibody binding was expressed as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), values for which were corrected for nonspecific binding by subtracting MFI measured for the matched isotype control sample.
Similar(51)
Duration of receptor binding is expressed as the dissociation constant (koff) of the receptor-ligand complex, measured using a competitive radioligand assay.
Specific binding is expressed as percent tritium bound to AR, where 100% is the amount of specific tritiated-testosterone bound in the absence of competing cold ligand minus background (non-specific binding to substrate and proteins).
Antibody-binding was expressed as mean fluorescence intensity corrected for nonspecific binding using matched isotype control antibodies.
Specific [3H]-DEX binding was determined as the difference between total and nonspecific binding and was expressed as sites/cell.
Under the assumption that binding of each PIP2 to GIRK2 is non-cooperative (independent), the fraction of PIP2 binding sites occupied was expressed as: (2) q = x k d + x, where q is the fraction of occupied PIP2 binding sites, x is ligand concentration and k d is the apparent dissociation constant.
More suggestions(16)
binding was seen as
binding was enhanced as
binding was computed as
binding was reduced as
binding was calculated as
binding was displayed as
binding was considered as
binding was determined as
binding was performed as
binding was defined as
binding was quantified as
binding was assessed as
binding was used as
binding was detected as
binding was evaluated as
binding was estimated as
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com