Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Similar(60)
Upon binding to the much larger integrin, the fluorescent tag on either disintegrin tumbles in solution at a slower rate compared to the unbound state resulting in increased levels of polarization.
As for the protein molecular functions, all the network's proteins take, mainly, part in protein (especially ubiquitin protein ligase and nuclear hormone binding) and ion (ATP) binding and present catalytic activity (protein kinase), but peripheral membrane proteins take part in lipid binding to a much larger degree than the rest of the proteins in the network.
In addition, the dissociation constants of ketoclomazone for binding to EcDXS were much higher than those for binding to HiDXS.
In this case, it is very likely that BCR binding to antigens is much more instantaneous than FcγRIIB colliding with the Fc of IgG upon IC stimulation.
In this case, it is very likely that BCR binding to antigens is much more instantaneous than FcγRIIB colliding with the Fc of IgG upon immunocomplex stimulation.
In contrast, HKII binding to mitochondria was much weaker and readily displaced by excess HKI.
Since the acceptors are in excess and binding to POPS is much stronger, the peptide, after dissociating from the donors into water, is most likely to bind to the acceptors.
For example, first strand cDNA synthesis in solution followed by binding to beads was, surprisingly, much less effective than pre-binding of NRO RNA to beads followed by solid-phase-based synthesis.
Both of these complexes have a similar association rate for RNA, but a very much slower dissociation rate than that seen for the eIF4AIII-MLN51 SELOR complex in the absence of a nucleotide, showing that RNA binding to these complexes is much tighter.
The specificity of binding to nonreceptor proteins is much lower than that of the association with the receptors.
It competes with CD28 for binding to CD80/CD86 with a much higher affinity for these ligands, and provides a negative feedback loop (Sfikakis & Via 1997).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com