binding sites were identified

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "binding sites were identified" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in scientific or research contexts when discussing the discovery or recognition of specific locations where molecules, such as proteins or drugs, interact with other molecules. Example: "In our study, several binding sites were identified on the target protein, which may play a crucial role in drug design."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Moreover, 2 putative RamBRe binding sites were identified in the upstream region of iclRe through pull-down assays.

Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering

Many putative transcription factor binding sites were identified in the predicted promoter region of Rbcasp3, including immune factor- and cancer signal-inducible sites.

Fish & Shellfish Immunology

Two Cdc20 binding sites were identified on BubR1 [47], [47].

Plosone

In human breast cancer cells, MCF7, 10,205 estrogen receptor binding sites were identified [32].

Plosone

Overall, multiple candidate transcription factor binding sites were identified that met these criteria (Fig. 4A).

Plosone

In the disordered regions specific protein binding sites were identified by using Anchor program [28].

Plosone

The potential transcription factor binding sites were identified by TESS and MatInspector.

Plosone

The E2F1 binding sites were identified using the transcription factor search program PROMO [29].

Plosone

Based on this similarity, the regulatory region including the repressor and Cro proteins and their promoter binding sites were identified.

Plosone

HNF4 and HNF6 binding sites were identified by manual comparison to published consensus binding sequences [36] [39].

Plosone

Potential primary and secondary substrate binding sites were identified and docking simulations indicated likely substrates including prenyl and phenolic molecules.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing scientifically, follow "binding sites were identified" with a specific method or tool that was used for identification to provide context and strengthen the accuracy of the claim.

Common error

Avoid using active voice constructions (e.g. "Researchers identified binding sites") when the passive voice better suits the context and maintains focus on the binding sites themselves. "Binding sites were identified" is often preferable in scientific writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "binding sites were identified" functions as a passive voice construction, commonly used in scientific writing to report the discovery or detection of specific locations where molecules interact. As Ludwig AI suggests, it's a grammatically correct and usable phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "binding sites were identified" is a grammatically correct and highly prevalent passive voice construction used primarily within scientific literature. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase reports discoveries of molecular interaction locations and often appears in academic papers and research reports. While alternatives such as "binding sites were located" or "binding sites were detected" exist, the original phrase remains a standard and effective way to convey this specific type of scientific finding. When using this phrase, always provide information about the method used for identification.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

binding sites were located

This alternative focuses on the physical location of the binding sites.

binding sites were detected

This emphasizes the detection or observation of the binding sites.

binding sites were discovered

This suggests the finding of previously unknown binding sites.

binding sites have been identified

This alternative uses the present perfect tense, emphasizing the ongoing relevance of the identification.

identification of binding sites

This turns the phrase into a noun phrase, suitable for different grammatical contexts.

binding sites were mapped

This alternative focuses on the spatial arrangement of binding sites.

binding sites were characterized

This emphasizes the description of the properties of the binding sites.

binding sites were revealed

This suggests the uncovering of binding sites that were previously hidden or unknown.

binding sites were ascertained

This implies a more rigorous or definite identification of the binding sites.

binding regions were identified

This substitutes "sites" with "regions", implying that the identified locations may be broader areas instead of precise points.

FAQs

How is "binding sites were identified" typically used in scientific writing?

In scientific writing, "binding sites were identified" is used to report the discovery of locations on molecules, such as proteins or DNA, where other molecules can interact. This phrase is often followed by the method used to identify the sites and their potential functional significance.

What are some alternative ways to say "binding sites were identified"?

You can use alternatives like "binding sites were located", "binding sites were detected", or "binding sites were discovered" depending on the context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing the identification of binding sites?

In scientific writing, passive voice (e.g. "binding sites were identified") is often preferred over active voice (e.g. "Researchers identified binding sites") because it emphasizes the finding (the binding sites) rather than the agent (the researchers).

Which is more appropriate, "binding sites were identified" or "binding sites was identified"?

"Binding sites were identified" is correct because "sites" is plural, requiring the plural verb "were". The singular form, "binding sites was identified", is grammatically incorrect.