Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(4)
To our great surprise the binding sites we detected for SeqA and RNAP were highly similar.
Among transcription factor binding sites we detected higher H3.3 turnover at distal cis-acting sites compared to proximal genic transcription factor binding sites.
Finally, by integrating the conservation analysis of transcription factors with the enrichment analysis of binding sites we detected two possible mechanisms via which regulons may be modified in these parasites.
The SeqA binding sites we detected with our modified method were exclusively canonical binding sites with binding signals being proportional to the number of GATC sites in the respective regions.
Similar(56)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02024.019 In addition to the DXPas34 binding site, we detected MSL peaks on the promoters, gene bodies and intronic regions of other key XIC regulators including the genes of the long non-coding (lnc) RNAs Xist and Jpx.
In contrast to cell-type restricted binding obtained for most sites, we detected 116 highly conserved GAS sites whose recognition by STATs transcended cell types.
As only 10% of the binding sites were detected at intergenic regions, we focused our further analyses on the role of MSL and NSL complexes in gene regulation at the promoter and/or GB regions.
We developed a method called SeqSite for detecting binding regions and pinpointing closely spaced adjacent binding sites in detected binding regions.
We show the genome-wide high resolution binding profile of the POF protein where these different POF binding sites are detected.
This is a phenomenon arising from the integration of cavity detection into the workflow and represents a case where two overlapping binding sites are detected (depicted in red and yellow).
Overlapping σ-factor binding sites were detected frequently in Escherichia coli: e.g. 38 genes were assigned to 4 different sigma factors and 2 genes were even assigned to 6 sigma factors (Cho et al. 2014).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com