Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(1)
For each predicted binding site, we listed the nodal and tip events according to previously published parameters (Levin et al. 2013).
Similar(59)
To further verify if p53retriever recognized already established p53 binding sites, we compared our approach with lists of p53 target genes and REs previously reported.
To generate a list of unambiguous CTCF negative RAD21 binding sites we removed these sites, leaving 667 reassessed CTCF independent RAD21 binding sites, which we define as motif and CTCF-independent RAD21 binding sites (MCIB).
After obtaining the list of genes nearest to ZNF274 binding sites, we determined their expression level in K562 cells.
The position of the HSE (p-value <1×10−4) closest to the peak of each binding site is listed in Table 1 and in Table S2.
The motifs with a known TF binding site are listed in the Additional file 1: Figure S4.
Residues that are predicted to be within 5 Å of GO at each binding site are listed in Table 2.
Around 14 general binding site descriptors are listed for each of the pockets, with the majority of them derived from fpocket (19).
The list of factors and their putative binding sites are listed in Supplementary Datasheet S1.
All of the potential binding sites are listed in Table S1.
Putative miR binding sites were listed only when their presence was also supported by an independent algorithm, miRanda [18].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com