Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Then, the top-200, top-20, and Boltzmann-weighted averages of the binding scores were calculated, which served as the references for each protein.
For each regulatory interaction, binding scores were calculated based on position matrix values or inserted from the original sources.
The binding scores were calculated on the basis of the amino acid sequence of the peptide and the HLA molecule as described elsewhere [ 20- 22].
Underlined amino acids indicate the predicted residues that interact with the MHC binding groove from P1 to P9. DR4 binding scores were calculated according to the method of Hammer et al. [ 11]. hCII, human type II collagen; hAG, human aggrecan; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen.
Similar(56)
(A ) Read count and motif binding weight scores were calculated for: (1) all CRMs (All); (2) CRMs shared in human and at least one additional non-primate (Beyond primates); (2) human CRMs shared in macaque only (Primates); and (3) the equivalent number of CRMs (equal to the number of Beyond primate CRMs) ranked by the SWEMBL peak intensity score for the TF in question (Top).
For example, EEL approach was used to scan a given pair of orthologous sequences to identify conserved TF binding sites, and, then EEL scores were calculated by considering both distances and differences in the angles between adjacent binding sites [41].
After docking, a number of further scores were calculated including the binding affinity (MolDock Score) and re-ranking score (Rerank Score).
Concerning the SD-binding motif, the position weight matrix (PWM) scores were calculated using the 2557 ChIP-seq peaks in Drosophila genome obtained by Ikmi et al98.
Additionally, overlay similarity scores were calculated between the three structures for the protein, co-binding peptides, and bound abacavir using Discovery Studio [42].
All scores were calculated using in-house developed scoring algorithms and TRANSFAC transcription factor binding motif definitions [ 33].
Mean subscale scores were calculated.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com