Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Binding proteins are typically isolated from combinatorial libraries of scaffold proteins using one of the many library screening tools available, such as phage display, yeast surface display or mRNA display.
Similar(58)
Anion-binding motifs in proteins are typically conserved in sequence and conformation.
The ATP-binding sites of these proteins are typically positioned at the interface between adjacent subunits, suggesting coupling of ATP binding and hydrolysis events with changes of intersubunit interactions followed by a synchronized global change in the ring structure; the chemical state of individual subunits would be influenced by the intersubunit interactions and vice versa.
The majority of R proteins are typically composed of a nucleotide-binding site (NB) with a leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain of variable length at the C-terminus.
Reporter proteins are typically fluorescent proteins or luminescent proteins.
In contrast, DnaK binding affinity for native proteins is typically in the μM range, with reaction KD's reported between 0.01 1mM 44, 5) and 1-50 mM (6).
RNA binding proteins (RBPs) are typically involved in non-equilibrium cellular processes, and specificity can arise from differences in ground state, transition state, or product states of the binding reactions for alternative RNAs.
Satellite DNA sequences typically do not possess similarity among chromosomes or across species, but their DNA-binding proteins are frequently conserved.
Photoaffinity labeling has been used as a promising approach to detection and isolation of carbohydrate-binding proteins, which are typically characterized by low binding affinity and selectivity.
These "compatible functional groups" involved in binding small molecules to proteins, which are typically used to define pharmacophores, are referred to here simply as "features".
Furthermore, SLiMs recognised by the same motif-binding pocket are typically found in multiple non-homologous proteins (Fig. 1b- d).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com