binding partners have been

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "binding partners have been" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing agreements, relationships, or collaborations between parties that are legally or formally connected. Example: "The binding partners have been working together for several years to achieve their mutual goals."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

27 human-written examples

Some binding partners have been identified, including Raptor [29], which binds to substrates and presents them to Tor for phosphorylation, and LST8 [31], [31], which stabilizes the TOR complex.

Plosone

Despite the importance of these phosphotyrosines in JAK2 function, only a few sites and binding partners have been identified.

Stanford University

With respect to apoptosis inhibition, at least three binding partners have been identified in the cytoplasm; the apoptosis signaling kinase 1, the thioredoxin-interacting protein and actin, where actin protects Trx-1 from degradation and preserves its anti-apoptotic function [17, 21].

Chemistry Central Journal

It is important to notice that all structural studies of microtubules with binding partners have been carried out by adding the partners to preassembled (usually taxol-stabilized) microtubules.

Plosone

Since several binding partners have been reported to interact with the C-terminus of FLNa molecule, these mutations may perturb their interaction as well [1], [26].

Plosone

In addition, other receptor tyrosine kinase binding partners have been identified for both Lrig1 and Lrig3, leaving open the question of whether defective ErbB signaling is responsible for the observed mouse phenotypes.

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

33 human-written examples

The interaction of XPA and its binding partners has been extensively studied; however, the structures of the full-length XPA DNA complex remain to be defined.

Bioscience Reports

To date no interactions or binding partners had been attributed to the LD3 domain (Hoellerer et al., 2003; Brown and Turner, 2004).

Biology Open

In the past 4 decades of desmin research, a growing number of desmin binding partners has been described (see also a previous review on desmin interactions [ 38]).

Acta Neuropathologica

The TRAP-like family protein is believed to provide a crucial link between the host cell and the parasite's cytoplasmic actin myosin motor that powers the invasion of the parasite but no host binding partners had been identified so far.

Cellular Microbiology

In the yeast protein-interaction network, the observed negative correlation between the connectivity of a protein and the average connectivity of its binding partners has been seen as a possible adaptation which allows the network to be resilient to the propagation of deleterious perturbations [ 14].

BMC Genomics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing proteins or molecules, clearly specify which molecule's "binding partners have been" identified. This provides essential context.

Common error

Avoid using vague pronouns like 'it' or 'this' when referring back to the molecule whose "binding partners have been" identified. Always be explicit.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "binding partners have been" functions as a declarative statement indicating that specific molecules or proteins are known to interact with others. This construction is commonly observed in scientific discourse, as evidenced by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "binding partners have been" is a grammatically sound and scientifically relevant expression used to convey that specific interactions between molecules or proteins are established and known. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and suitable for formal writing, particularly in scientific contexts. To maximize clarity, always explicitly state which molecule's binding partners are being discussed. While alternatives like "interaction partners have been" exist, "binding partners have been" offers a specific and precise description of molecular interactions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

specific binding partners have been

Highlights that specific partners, as opposed to general ones, have been identified.

binding partners were identified

Changes the tense from present perfect to past, indicating the identification occurred in the past and might not be ongoing.

numerous binding partners have been

Emphasizes that many binding partners have been identified.

novel binding partners have been

Highlights that new or previously unknown binding partners have been identified.

interaction partners have been

Replaces "binding" with "interaction", emphasizing a broader range of relationships beyond strict binding.

potential binding partners have been

Suggests that possible, but not yet confirmed, binding partners exist.

binding proteins have been

More specific, focusing only on protein binding partners.

no binding partners have been found

Indicates a lack of identified binding partners, a negation of the original phrase.

interacting proteins have been

Similar to "interaction partners have been", but specifically focuses on proteins.

ligand binding partners have been

Specifically references ligands that have binding partners.

FAQs

How can I use "binding partners have been" in a sentence?

Use "binding partners have been" to indicate that certain molecules or proteins are known to interact with other specific molecules. For example: "Several "binding partners have been" identified for this receptor protein."

What's the difference between "binding partners have been identified" and "binding partners were identified"?

"Binding partners have been identified" suggests the identification is relevant to the present, while "binding partners were identified" implies the identification occurred in the past and may or may not be currently relevant.

What is an alternative to "binding partners have been" that emphasizes interaction?

You could use "interaction partners have been" to emphasize broader relationships beyond simple binding.

Is it better to say "binding partners have been found" or "binding partners have been identified"?

"Binding partners have been identified" is more formal and precise, often preferred in scientific writing. "Binding partners have been found" is slightly less formal but acceptable.