Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Batch pH studies were performed to determine the optimum binding pH for both the Cu2 + and Pb2 + to the synthesized nanomaterials.
Similar(59)
The column showed excellent selectivity, high binding capacities (88.3 μmol adenosine g−1, pH 7.0) and the lowest binding pH (4.0 for cytidine and as low as 2.24 for xanthosine).
The binding pH ranges for the two ligands were different, but the optimum pH values were the same for each other (pH 6.0).
The optimum binding pH values for the three ligands were different from each other, but kept in the range of 5.0 6.0.
Aggregation and deposition increased with decreasing pH for both polyelectrolytes.
The optimal pH for both enzymes was determined at pH 8.5.
Interestingly JMC25406 showed a broad pH optimum for both activities ranging between pH 5.5-7.5.
For proteins with a small IER, the optimal pH for binding or elution can usually be predicted by their pI.
From our results presented here it is clear that the diacidic motif in the N-terminal region and the histidine in the D-loop responsible for Ca2+ binding and pH gating, respectively, are both conserved in all PpPIP1s and PpPIP2s.
The optimal pH for the binding of the nickel beads to the His tag, according to the manufacturer, is 7.5 8.0.
In this study, we describe the importance of the microenvironment with respect to pH for ligand binding to the RKIP pocket.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com