Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
A bioinformatics search predicted that many sequences upstream of CAZy genes harbor BrlA-binding sites in P. decumbens [ 35], but evidence for a direct binding interaction has not yet been revealed.
Specific binding interactions between FKBP51/FKBP52 and the steroid receptor proteins have been proposed, including the BF-3 (binding function 3) regulatory site [ 14] and the H1 H3 loop [ 15] of the ligand-binding domain, although a direct binding interaction has not been demonstrated [ 16].
Similar(58)
More than 100 different Fn-binding microbial proteins have been reported so far, although most of the Fn-microbial protein interactions have not been characterized in detail.
The interaction of LPS with its cognate binding proteins has not, as yet, been structurally elucidated.
The binding site has not been mapped.
The hydrogen bond-rich interaction of sialic acid has not resulted in higher binding affinity.
Where as, how hydrogen bonds optimize the hydrophobic interactions, at the protein-ligand interface that increases the binding affinity of complex molecules, has not been properly analyzed.
The binding interaction between barttin and ClC-K channels has not been characterized, although the crystal structure of CLC was resolved.
Although direct interaction between Syt1 and gangliosides has not been previously reported, the Syt1 ganglioside interaction is physiologically relevant because botulinum neurotoxin B (BoNT/B) gains entry into cells by binding Syt1 only in the presence of gangliosides.
The parasite-binding site on P-selectin has not been mapped, although it is known that antibodies that inhibit interactions between P-selectin and leukocytes do not affect P. falciparum binding (Ref. 56).
On the other hand, the modest gains in binding affinity observed suggest that this ligand set has not yet found true bivalent interaction with the M6P/IGF2R (i.e., simultaneous binding to two distinct M6P-binding pockets).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com