Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
The fit of concentration response curves with a first-order binding function revealed that the half-maximal blocking concentration (IC50) was 1.1 ± 0.05 mM for the WT and 0.87 ± 0.06 mM for the L858F mutant channels.
Similar(59)
DAVID classification of proteins by molecular function revealed that most of the proteins were involved in binding (including binding with iron ion, collagen, heme, sugar, and tetrapyrrole) or had structural activity or antioxidant activity.
A global GO analysis [ 70] of unisequences in relation to molecular function revealed that the largest number of transcripts was related to protein binding, followed by peptidase and transferase activities, calcium-binding, enzyme regulation, nucleic acid binding, structural protein and transporter activities, lipid binding, and transcriptional regulation.
GO mapping to molecular function revealed that a majority of genes from the tissue transcriptomes of wild silkmoths have almost equal distribution for 'binding' function (property of binding macro-molecules) and catalytic activity.
MM-PBSA calculations revealed that binding was energetically favorable and driven by the electrostatic interactions.
Solvent mapping revealed that TPP interacted with binding hot spots within the PPARγ ligand binding domain.
In vitro binding studies revealed that Rio2 binds Slx9-1.
However, a closer look at the binding site revealed that the mutation displaced the side-chains that form the PLP-binding surface (Fig. 3B).
Tissue sections binding assays revealed that Mu-IFN-CSP was also able to specific binding to liver.
DNA-protein binding experiments revealed that cyclic stretch enhanced nuclear binding to the AP-1 site, which was partially supershifted by antibody to c-Jun.
Molecular function assignment revealed that oxidoreductase activity, transferase activity, ion binding and nucleic acid/nucleotide binding accounted for the largest portion of the P. mariana unique genes identified (~47% combined).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com