Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
LRP8 is also crucial for binding ephrins, which are involved with directed growth and cell migration [ 44].
Similar(59)
Ephs and ephrins, which are known to regulate synapse formation and synaptic plasticity, are related with cognitive impairments in AD (Chen et al., 2012).
Blocking the interaction between EphRs and the PDZ protein GRIP or extracellular application of soluble forms of B-ephrins (which are pre-synaptic ligands for the EphB receptors) reduces mossy fiber LTPs in the CA3 region, suggesting a requirement for trans-synaptic interactions between post-synaptic EphB receptors and pre-synaptic B-ephrins (Contractor et al., 2002).
While the G protein has neither HA nor neuraminidase activities, it plays an important role in HeV and NiV binding to ephrin-B2 and ephrin-B3, which are members of a large family of important signaling proteins involved in cell cell interactions.
Tyrosine kinases remain clustered together, in particular the Ephrin kinases (which are part of the RTK family of kinases).
The last type of chemorepellant that will be discussed is Ephrin and its Ephrin receptor tyrosine kinases, which are repulsive cues for MGE-derived interneurons, as demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo[ 173, 174].
Examples include shedding of the Ephrin ligand which is stimulated by recruitment of G proteins and shedding of CD44 which can occur after binding to small hyaluronan oligosaccharides or by EGF stimulation through activation of Rac GTPases.
Ephrin-A, which is produced in the ventral limb bud, repels LMCL axons, which express EphA4.
Furthermore, miR-210 induces angiogenesis in part repressing endothelial ligand ephrin-A3, which is an antiangiogenic factor [ 97].
Members of the ephrin-A family are glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-anchored to the cell surface and activate EphA receptors, which are receptor tyrosine kinases.
The difficulties in obtaining submicromolar EphA4 antagonists are likely due to the nature of the ephrin-binding pocket of EphA4, which is very broad (exceeding an estimated 900 Å), lacks sufficient hot spot regions, and is highly dynamic.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com